FEATURE
STORY
| Jonathan MacArthur:
What Happens When Actual Humans Run for Office? |
|
Jonathan
MacArthur seems almost too human to be a politician. The Justice
of the Peace candidate (North Las Vegas, Department 3) describes
himself as a “beer-drinking, football-watching, backyard
barbecuing kind of guy.” He laughs freely, he gets angry
on occasion, and unlike most politicians, he might actually
disagree with you in the course of a conversation. He’s
even willing to support a controversial stance. “Ask
me anything,” he says. “I’ll give an honest
answer, whether it’ll help me get elected or not.”
For instance, as a supporter
of the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable searches
and seizures, Jonathan would require police officers to adhere
to regulations when conducting searches. Not all judges do.
Specifically, Jonathan
cites a criminal case in which the arresting officers claimed
that a defendant consented to being searched, but the defendant
(along with a witness) claimed otherwise. By law, the dispute
may turn on the defendant’s signature, or lack thereof,
on a consent-to-search card. In this case, however, the officers
didn’t use the card.
Even though the officers
couldn’t provide a card, Jonathan says that some judges
would allow the evidence to be heard. Jonathan, on the other
hand, would suppress any evidence which he felt was gathered
illegally. “I’m going to uphold the standards
of the Constitution,” he says.

Taking a strong stance
in favor of the 4th Amendment is risky. Political adversaries
could label the stance “soft on crime.” Jonathan,
on the other hand, feels that Constitutional protections actually
reduce crime. He says that people have more respect for the
community, and are less likely to commit crimes, if they feel
that they have a vigilant and honest judiciary.
The judiciary helps to
ensure stability, and stability is profitable—especially
for Real Estate professionals. Jonathan says that crime is
the most destabilizing factor on property values. Moreover,
when people leave well-established communities because of
crime, the communities are left with conditions that attract
more criminals. Since crime attracts more crime, the judiciary’s
job is to minimize criminal behavior by setting an example
of respect for all citizens.
For Jonathan, the most
rewarding judicial cases are those in which all parties walk
away feeling like they had a fair hearing. For example, while
serving as Judge Pro Tem, Jonathan presided over an eviction
case in which a family took good care of the rental property
but owed the landlord two months’ rent. The renters
claimed that they could have the money in two weeks, but the
landlord rolled his eyes.
Although the law would
have allowed Jonathan to evict the family within a few days,
he instead chose to broker a compromise. The family gave the
property owner what money they had, and also forfeited the
security deposit. In return, the owner let the family stay
for two weeks. The landlord immediately received most of the
money he was owed, and the family had enough time to find
another place to live. At the end of the hearing, both the
owner and the family were smiling.
Jonathan’s
belief in fairness was solidified by an early experience in
his adult life. At age 19, while studying political science
at UNLV, Jonathan was arrested for the manufacture and sale
of explosives—for making firecrackers in his garage.
The police performed an undercover,
controlled buy at his house. Hiding in the bushes were a representative
from the mayor’s office and some television reporters
who would later harass Jonathan’s grandmother. His mug
shot became the story of the night.
When Jonathan entered the
legal system, his public defender advised him to plead guilty
to a charge that could have been treated as a felony or a
gross misdemeanor. Because he had political aspirations for
the future, Jonathan refused. The courts didn’t explain
the law, his rights, or his responsibilities to him, so he
looked up the statute himself. Although the law prohibiting
the manufacture and sale of explosives was designed to prevent
people from making bombs, Jonathan felt that the law had been
used beyond its scope, to prosecute a kid for making firecrackers.
Fortunately, Jonathan’s
studiousness served him well. A law professor at UNLV, who
was impressed with Jonathan and wanted him to continue his
studies, called an attorney. The attorney handled Jonathan’s
case pro bono.
As it turns out, Jonathan’s
interactions with the undercover police were his saving grace.
The officers tried to offer him $85 for a small sack of firecrackers,
but Jonathan only accepted $15. Although proud of his wares,
he wasn’t interested in profit. On tape, Jonathan sounded
more like a nerd than a terrorist.
The judge finally settled
the case, on the condition that Jonathan do well in school.
“And I did,” Jonathan recalls. “I was so
scared I made the Dean’s List.”
Although Jonathan had the
connections, via his professor, to minimize his legal difficulties,
he understands that justice is sometimes denied to the most
vulnerable. “I’m a pretty bright guy,” he
says. “If I was scared and confused, how bad would it
be for someone who’s illiterate?”
Jonathan’s
experience as a defendant drove him to become a defense attorney,
and eventually—he hopes—a judge. He feels that
he is a politically viable JOP candidate because he has lived
in the Las Vegas Valley for 35 years, half of those in or
near North Las Vegas. In addition, North Las Vegas has a cultural
diversity and progressive climate that fits well with his
stances on civil rights and equality. Moreover, Department
3 is a new department, created because of a population increase,
so there is no entrenched incumbent.
Jonathan describes politics
as a “bloodsport,” and he softens the ruthlessness
by offering voters an honest choice. “If you agree with
what I’m saying, then you should vote for me. If you
don’t like what I have to say, then you should probably
be voting for someone else.”
The August 12 primary will
narrow the field from four candidates to two. The general
election will be held on November 4, the day the nation chooses
our next President.
Jonathan can be reached
by calling (702) 868-2724, or e-mail
JonathanMacArthur4JOP@gmail.com.
You can also visit his Web site at www.JonathanMacArthur.com.
Photography by: Elisabeth Libby

|